International
Celebrations Erupt in Iran Following Missile Attack Against Israel, Highlighting Escalating Regional Tensions

In a development that has added a new layer of tension to the already volatile Middle East, celebrations have erupted across multiple cities in Iran following a large-scale missile attack launched against Israel. This attack, which occurred on October 1, 2024, involved approximately 180 ballistic missiles aimed at various strategic and civilian locations throughout Israel. The missile barrage is seen as a significant retaliation against recent Israeli actions, including airstrikes that killed prominent Hezbollah figures, among them Hassan Nasrallah, the group’s leader.
Public Celebrations Across Iranian Cities
Soon after the missile launch, thousands of Iranians took to the streets to celebrate what many in the country see as a bold response to Israeli actions in the region. The celebratory scenes were reported from cities such as Tehran, Mashhad, Qom, and Isfahan, with crowds chanting slogans like “Death to Israel” and “Victory for Palestine,” underscoring the depth of anti-Israel sentiment among parts of the Iranian population.
In the Iranian capital, Tehran, residents gathered in large numbers in several major squares, waving Iranian flags and carrying posters of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Fireworks lit up the sky, and many chanted slogans in support of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which has taken responsibility for the missile launch. The streets were filled with vehicles blaring horns, while loudspeakers played nationalistic songs praising Iran’s military might.
In Mashhad, a city considered holy within the country, similar scenes were observed. Clerics were seen delivering speeches in support of the Iranian military actions, framing the missile attack as a righteous response to the perceived aggressions of Israel. Religious symbolism was heavily present during these celebrations, with many viewing the attack as a fulfillment of a duty to protect not only Iranian interests but also those of their allies, particularly Hezbollah and the Palestinian cause.
Iranian Government’s Narrative
The Iranian government has framed the missile attack as a defensive measure, retaliating against recent Israeli operations that resulted in the deaths of multiple Hezbollah leaders in Lebanon, including Hassan Nasrallah. State-run media outlets like Press TV and Fars News Agency were quick to highlight the supposed success of the missile strikes, showing images of the missile launches and footage of celebrations across the country.
Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei made a public statement shortly after the missile attack, declaring, “This is a warning to Israel and its allies—any aggression will be met with a firm and crushing response.” The government’s messaging has focused on portraying the missile attack as a legitimate act of self-defense in light of what they describe as Israeli provocations and continued aggression against the “Axis of Resistance,” which includes Iran, Hezbollah, and various Palestinian factions.
The state-controlled media has also emphasized the effectiveness of the missile strikes, although the exact extent of the damage in Israel has not been fully disclosed by Israeli authorities. The Iranian narrative positions the attack as a victory for Iranian military capability, reinforcing its deterrence against Israeli threats and showcasing the capability of its ballistic missile arsenal.
Response from Israel and the International Community
The missile attack, however, has prompted a swift and stern response from Israel and its allies. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned the attack, describing it as a “grave mistake” by Iran and warning of severe consequences. Netanyahu addressed the nation, vowing that Israel would “ensure the security of its citizens and retaliate forcefully.” The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) responded by launching airstrikes against what they described as Iranian military assets and Hezbollah positions in Lebanon.
The United States has also reacted to the escalation. President Joe Biden reiterated American support for Israel’s right to defend itself, while the U.S. Navy deployed additional destroyers equipped with missile defense systems to the eastern Mediterranean to provide further support for Israel’s defense. The U.S. State Department has urged restraint but also condemned the missile attack, stating that it further destabilizes an already fragile region.
Meanwhile, the United Nations has called for immediate de-escalation. A spokesperson for the UN Secretary-General issued a statement expressing deep concern over the potential for the conflict to spiral into a broader regional war, urging all parties to step back from further military actions. UN Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process, Tor Wennesland, has warned that continued hostilities could lead to a situation that is “increasingly difficult to control and has grave consequences for civilians on all sides.”
Impact on Regional Dynamics
The celebrations in Iran following the missile attack underscore the complex dynamics of the Middle East, where nationalism, religious sentiment, and political alliances intersect in deeply rooted conflicts. The outpouring of public support for the missile strike reflects not only the government’s control over public perception through state media but also the genuine anti-Israel sentiment that exists within significant portions of the Iranian population.
This escalation has put Iran’s relationship with other countries in the region under the spotlight. Neighboring Gulf nations such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have historically had strained relations with Iran, primarily due to Tehran’s regional ambitions and its support for proxy groups. These nations are watching the developments closely, as any further escalation between Iran and Israel could have ramifications for their security as well.
Furthermore, the attack and subsequent celebrations have emboldened Hezbollah and other militant groups aligned with Iran. Hezbollah’s acting leader, Naim Qassem, made a statement praising the missile strikes and vowing continued resistance against Israel. The Iranian-backed group, which has significant military capabilities, has been coordinating closely with Iranian officials throughout the recent tensions, and observers fear that Hezbollah could escalate the conflict by launching attacks from Lebanon, further destabilizing the region.
Public Sentiment and Propaganda
The public celebrations following the missile attack also highlight how the Iranian government has effectively used nationalistic propaganda to rally public support. State media channels, along with local clerics and community leaders, have portrayed the missile strikes as a powerful and justified response to Israeli aggression. The public narrative focuses on the idea of “resistance,” with a heavy emphasis on protecting regional allies and defending the integrity of the Muslim world against external threats, particularly from Israel and Western powers.
Televised broadcasts have shown clips of the missiles being launched, accompanied by patriotic music and commentary that glorifies Iran’s military capabilities. Social media channels linked to government and IRGC-aligned groups have been filled with posts celebrating the attack and calling for further action to “liberate Palestine.” This deliberate framing helps maintain public support for Iran’s regional interventions and justifies the significant resources allocated to its missile program and proxy networks across the Middle East.
Potential Repercussions and Future Outlook
The missile attack and subsequent celebrations represent a dangerous escalation that could have far-reaching implications. The most immediate concern is the potential for a broader conflict involving multiple countries across the Middle East. Israel, already involved in active military operations against Hezbollah, may escalate its retaliatory strikes, targeting not only Iranian interests but also proxies across Syria and Lebanon. Such actions could drag other regional players into the fray, increasing the risk of a wider war.
The economic impact of these developments is also significant. Iran is already under heavy international sanctions, which have severely restricted its economy. Continued military actions and further international condemnation could lead to even more stringent economic measures, exacerbating domestic issues such as inflation and unemployment. While the government may succeed in using nationalist sentiment to divert attention from these problems in the short term, the long-term sustainability of such a strategy remains questionable.
For Israel, the attack is likely to lead to increased military spending and potentially more aggressive diplomatic moves to isolate Iran. The Abraham Accords, which normalized relations between Israel and several Arab states, may be further expanded to include deeper security cooperation against perceived threats from Iran. This could lead to a more polarized Middle East, with blocs forming around those aligned against Iran and those supporting it.
In conclusion, the missile attack against Israel and the subsequent celebrations in Iran underscore the fragile state of Middle Eastern geopolitics. With both sides showing little sign of backing down, and with public sentiment in Iran firmly behind the government’s hardline approach, the prospect of a peaceful resolution seems increasingly remote. The international community’s role in mediating and containing the crisis will be critical in the days and weeks to come, as the risk of broader regional conflict looms large.
For further details, you can refer to in-depth coverage on Al Jazeera and BBC News.
data breaches
Ransomware Claims Emerge as Colt Tech Outages Stretch On

Colt Technology Services’ internal systems remain down after a suspected ransomware attack; WarLock gang claims to have stolen 1 million documents, demanding $200K ransom
Colt Technology Services is grappling with service disruptions after a cyber incident identified in mid-August. The WarLock ransomware group claims to have stolen 1 million internal documents, including employee and customer data, and is demanding $200,000. Colt continues manual incident response while restoring automated monitoring, as experts warn the attack underscores systemic telecom vulnerabilities.
Colt Technology Services, a multinational telecom provider, is scrambling to restore services after a cyber incident detected during the week of August 12 crippled key internal systems. The backup and support portals, including Colt Online and the Voice API platform, remain offline. The WarLock ransomware gang is claiming responsibility and has offered 1 million allegedly stolen documents for $200,000.
- The incident began in the week of August 12, affecting internal systems—not client infrastructure—but disrupting support services.
- WarLock ransomware has claimed responsibility, offering to sell “1 million documents” (salary info, customer contacts, executive emails) for $200,000.
- Colt proactively shut down affected systems and implemented manual monitoring processes. Restoration efforts are ongoing with forensic and law enforcement collaboration.
- Cybersecurity researcher Kevin Beaumont authenticated leaked filenames—including performance reviews and customer documentation—and highlighted possible exploitation of the ToolShell SharePoint zero-day vulnerability.
Investigative and Expert Insights
Beaumont suspects attackers targeted a SharePoint server exposed publicly (sharehelp.colt.net), potentially deploying webshells. He referenced Microsoft’s earlier warning about Storm-2603 exploiting ToolShell.
Colt said its incident response team—bolstered by third-party forensics and authorities—is working 24/7 to restore services.
“This is a wake-up call for critical infrastructure providers,” said El Mostafa Ouchen, cybersecurity author and practitioner. “Ransomware groups are exploiting unpatched enterprise platforms like SharePoint to gain a foothold. When attackers combine data theft with system disruption, organizations face double extortion. Telecom operators must prioritize segmentation, rapid patching, and zero-trust architecture to reduce systemic risk.”
Technical Analysis
How the Attack Likely Unfolded
- Initial exploit vector: probable compromise of on-prem SharePoint via the ToolShell zero-day vulnerability—Storm-2603 was known to exploit this.
- Lateral movement: intruders could have deployed a webshell to traverse infrastructure and access file repositories holding sensitive internal and customer data.
- Ransomware deployment: WarLock claims to possess 1 million files; the gang is leveraging extortion via stolen data on dark web leak sites.
Detection and Response
- Colt appears to have detected anomalous activity early, isolated internal systems, and immediately shut them down to prevent further spread.
- The company shifted to manual incident response, maintaining essential network monitoring without automated tools.
Mitigation Steps
- Rapid incident response, including isolating affected systems and involving cybersecurity experts and law enforcement.
- Securing exposed infrastructure—immediate plugging of SharePoint access points and webshell removal.
- Enhancing detection capabilities to preempt or identify similar attacks.
- Strengthening segmentation of internal tools from customer-facing infrastructure.
Impact & Response
Who’s affected:
- Colt customers—including businesses relying on the company’s support portals and Voice APIs—face service unavailability and disruption to operations.
- Internal stakeholders may face data exposure (salaries, executive emails, etc.), raising privacy and compliance concerns.
Actions Taken:
- Colt continues 24/7 investigations with forensic specialists and law enforcement; it’s still performing incident management manually while restoring systems.
- Customers are advised to use email or phone channels instead of impacted portals.
Long-Term Implications:
- Reputational damage for Colt, given the assertion of no customer data exposure is contestable amid leaked files.
- This breach could drive stronger regulation or scrutiny around telecom cybersecurity.
- Other critical infrastructure providers may reassess the security of on-prem systems, especially legacy platforms like SharePoint.
Background
Telecoms have increasingly become ransomware targets due to their strategic importance and potential to generate widespread disruption. The ToolShell SharePoint zero-day has been previously reported under active exploitation by threat actor Storm-2603.
Attacks on critical infrastructure raise alarm since downtime can ripple into broader economic and national security consequences.
Conclusion
Colt Technology Services is in a full-scale response to a cyberattack suspected to involve the WarLock ransomware gang. With outages persisting and 1 million documents allegedly stolen, experts say the incident underscores the need for telecoms and other critical providers to modernize security architectures and adopt zero-trust, patch discipline, and proactive resilience strategies.
Sources
- BankInfoSecurity – Ransomware Allegations Surface As Colt Outages Continue
- Dark Reading – Colt Telecommunications Struggles in Wake of Cyber Incident
- The Register – London Telco Colt’s Services Disrupted Amid Cyberattack
- Teiss – Cyber Incident at Colt Highlights Growing Threats to Critical Infrastructure
business
Windows 10 Deadline Looms: How to Stay Protected Beyond 2025

Free support ends October 14, 2025; new KB5063709 unlocks Extended Security Updates enrollment to keep critical patches flowing through October 2026.
Microsoft is warning Windows 10 users that free security updates end on October 14, 2025. A new cumulative update, KB5063709, enables a built-in enrollment flow for the Extended Security Updates (ESU) program, offering another year of fixes to October 13, 2026. Edge and WebView2 will still receive updates on Windows 10 until 2028.
With less than two months before Windows 10 reaches end of support, Microsoft has issued a final security warning: after October 14, 2025, no more free fixes. A fresh update, KB5063709, now exposes an “Enroll in Extended Security Updates” option inside Windows Update to help users secure one more year of patches.
- End of free support: Windows 10 (22H2) stops receiving free security updates on Oct. 14, 2025.
- Bridge program: Microsoft’s Consumer ESU extends security fixes to Oct. 13, 2026; enrollment is now available from Settings after installing KB5063709.
- Browser exception: Microsoft Edge and WebView2 Runtime will keep updating on Windows 10 through at least Oct. 2028—even if you don’t buy ESU.
- Scale: Windows 10 still represents roughly 43% of active Windows desktops worldwide (Statcounter, July 2025).
“After October 14, 2025… Microsoft will no longer provide security updates or fixes.” — Microsoft support page. Microsoft Support
“KB5063709… includes a fix for a bug that prevented enrollment in extended security updates.” — BleepingComputer (Aug. 12, 2025). BleepingComputer
“Edge and the WebView2 Runtime will continue to receive updates on Windows 10… until at least October 2028.” — Microsoft Edge lifecycle. Microsoft Learn
A separate storyline continues to roil the transition: a California lawsuit alleges Microsoft set the 2025 cutoff to push AI-ready PCs; Microsoft points to ESU as a safety net, but litigation underscores user anxiety about older, ineligible hardware.
What’s changing on Patch Tuesday:
- KB5063709 (Aug. 2025): Required to expose the ESU enrollment UI under Settings → Update & Security → Windows Update. It also resolves the enrollment-wizard crash and rolls in July’s security fixes (including one zero-day).
Enrollment mechanics (consumer ESU):
- Prereqs: Windows 10 22H2, admin rights, and Microsoft account sign-in (local accounts are not supported for ESU).
- Cost options: $30 one-year ESU, 1,000 Microsoft Rewards points, or free if you enable OneDrive settings sync—all visible in the built-in wizard after KB5063709.
Risk surface if you skip ESU:
- Unpatched remote code execution and privilege-escalation flaws accrue monthly across the kernel, Win32k, networking stack, printing, and driver ecosystems. Even with a supported browser, OS-level exposures (SMB, RPC, LSA, Credential Guard bypasses) remain unmitigated. (Derived from Microsoft monthly CVE cadence; see KB5063709 advisory context.)
Mitigations checklist (if you must remain on Windows 10):
- Enroll in ESU and keep Windows Defender/EDR signatures current.
- Harden attack surface: disable legacy protocols (SMBv1), restrict RDP, enforce LSA protection, and require smartcard/Windows Hello where possible. (General guidance aligned with Microsoft security baselines.)
- Application control: enable ASR rules and Smart App Control-equivalents; prefer standard user rights.
- Network containment: segment legacy Windows 10 devices; use firewall allow-lists and zero-trust access.
- Browser updates: keep Edge/WebView2 current; isolate risky web apps in Application Guard where available.
Impact & Response
Who’s affected: Home users, SMBs, schools, and agencies still running Windows 10—hundreds of millions of devices globally. Statcounter shows Windows 10 usage near 43% in July 2025, meaning a large residual population will face patch gaps without ESU.
Actions to take now:
- Install KB5063709, then open Windows Update → Enroll in Extended Security Updates and choose a plan.
- Plan upgrades to Windows 11 24H2+ or supported alternatives; Microsoft reiterates Oct. 2025 as the firm cutoff for free updates.
Long-term implications: Expect shrinking driver/app support and rising exploit availability on unpatched systems, even as browsers continue to update through 2028.
Background
Microsoft set Windows 10 22H2 as the final feature version and has repeated the Oct. 14, 2025 deadline since 2023–24 guidance. ESU is designed as a temporary bridge, not a multi-year extension. Browser support to 2028 offers partial protection, but it does not replace OS security hardening.
- “ESU buys time—but not immunity. Treat it like a controlled exit ramp: enroll now, apply strict hardening (kill SMBv1, lock down RDP, enforce LSA protection), and move critical workloads to supported platforms within 12 months. The cost of delaying migration will be paid in incident response.” — El Mostafa Ouchen, cybersecurity author & practitioner.
- Microsoft (support notice):
“After October 14, 2025… we will no longer provide security updates or fixes.” - BleepingComputer (on KB5063709):
“The update… fixes a bug that prevented enrollment in extended security updates.” - Microsoft Edge team (lifecycle policy):
“Edge and WebView2 will continue to receive updates on Windows 10 until at least October 2028.”
Conclusion
Microsoft’s warning is unambiguous: Windows 10’s free patch era ends on October 14, 2025. The KB5063709 + ESU path is a short-term safety measure to October 2026, not a strategy. Organizations and households should enroll if needed—but prioritize upgrading or retiring Windows 10 endpoints to reduce exposure as exploit pressure rises.
business
Imposter IT on Teams Opens the Door to Enterprise Compromise

Russian-linked group EncryptHub is impersonating IT staff on Microsoft Teams, walking victims into remote sessions, then abusing CVE-2025-26633 (“MSC EvilTwin”) to execute rogue .msc consoles and drop Fickle Stealer. Microsoft patched the bug, but unpatched Windows endpoints remain at risk.
A new campaign weaponizes trust in collaboration tools. Attackers pose as IT on Microsoft Teams, coax employees into remote access, and run PowerShell that pulls a loader exploiting CVE-2025-26633 in Microsoft Management Console. The flaw—now added to CISA’s KEV—lets a malicious .msc run when its benign twin is launched. Patch and tighten verification controls immediately.
A social-engineering wave is turning Microsoft Teams into a beachhead. Adversaries masquerade as internal help-desk staff, request remote access, and execute PowerShell that fetches a loader which plants twin .msc files. When mmc.exe opens the legitimate console, Windows loads the attacker’s EvilTwin from the MUIPath directory, handing over code execution.
“Social engineering remains one of the most effective tools… attackers impersonate IT support, gain trust and remote access, and ultimately deploy suspicious tools,” Trustwave SpiderLabs reported. Trustwave
What’s new in this campaign
- Initial access via Teams impersonation. Operators send Teams requests as “IT” and guide the user into a remote session.
- PowerShell loader. Typical first command:
powershell.exe -ExecutionPolicy Bypass … Invoke-RestMethod … runner.ps1 | iex
, which drops twin .msc files. - Exploit: CVE-2025-26633 / “MSC EvilTwin”—an MMC security-feature bypass that prioritizes a localized .msc in MUIPath (e.g., en-US) over the benign one. Patched by Microsoft in March 2025; listed by CISA KEV.
- Payloads and tooling. Fickle Stealer for data theft; SilentCrystal (Go loader) abusing Brave Support as a dropper; SOCKS5 backdoor for C2.
Demonstration (defender’s view, not exploit code)
- The lure: A user accepts a Teams contact from “IT Support.” A remote session starts.
- Command drop: Attacker runs a single PowerShell line (ExecutionPolicy Bypass) that downloads runner.ps1 from
cjhsbam[.]com
. - EvilTwin setup: The script writes two identically named .msc files; the malicious copy sits in …\System32\en-US (or a mock “C:\Windows␠\System32” with a trailing space), then mmc.exe loads the malicious one first.
- Post-exploit: Persistence, AES-encrypted tasking over C2, and optional info-stealing via Fickle Steal
Why this works
- Trust channel abuse: Users expect help-desk on Teams; the UI looks familiar. Prior research shows Teams vishing has delivered RATs and ransomware before.
- Living-off-the-land: PowerShell + signed Windows binaries (mmc.exe) keep telemetry subtle.
- Path precedence edge case: The MUIPath lookup lets a malicious localized .msc hijack execution—now patched, but effective on lagging fleets.
“Treat every ‘IT support’ request in Teams as untrusted until proven otherwise. Make users verify out-of-band, and make admins verify the OS. If your estate isn’t patched for CVE-2025-26633, you’re one click away from handing attackers mmc.exe on a silver platter. Block the social angle, patch the technical angle, and hunt for ExecutionPolicy Bypass like your business depends on it—because it does.” — El Mostafa Ouchen
Immediate actions (enterprise)
1) Patch priority
- Deploy March 2025 Windows updates that remediate CVE-2025-26633 across client and server. Validate compliance in WSUS/Intune/ConfigMgr; confirm exposure via MSRC / NVD.
2) Harden Teams trust boundaries
- Restrict External Access to allow-list domains; disable unsolicited chats from unknown tenants.
- Create a help-desk verification policy: no remote control unless the user initiates via the corporate portal/ticket, plus callback via a known internal number. (Microsoft and industry advisories consistently warn about tech-support impersonation.)
3) Detections to turn on today
- PowerShell: alert on
-ExecutionPolicy Bypass
,Invoke-RestMethod
,DownloadString
, orInvoke-Expression
launched from Teams, Teams.exe child, or interactive sessions. - MMC/EvilTwin indicators:
- mmc.exe loading .msc from MUIPath (…\System32\en-US*.msc) or paths with trailing spaces (e.g.,
C:\Windows␠\System32
). - Unexpected writes to localized .msc directories.
- New .msc files followed by immediate mmc.exe execution.
- mmc.exe loading .msc from MUIPath (…\System32\en-US*.msc) or paths with trailing spaces (e.g.,
Sample KQL (Microsoft Defender XDR)
DeviceProcessEvents
| where FileName =~ "powershell.exe"
| where ProcessCommandLine has_any ("-ExecutionPolicy Bypass","Invoke-RestMethod","Invoke-Expression","DownloadString")
| summarize count() by DeviceName, InitiatingProcessFileName, ProcessCommandLine, bin(TimeGenerated, 1h)
DeviceImageLoadEvents
| where InitiatingProcessFileName =~ "mmc.exe"
| where FolderPath has_any (@@"\System32\en-US\", @"\Windows \System32") // note the space before \System32
| summarize count() by DeviceName, FolderPath, InitiatingProcessCommandLine, bin(TimeGenerated, 1h)
4) Reduce blast radius
- Enforce ASR rules (e.g., block Office/Win32 child processes), Constrained Language Mode where feasible, and Device Control to prevent unauthorized admin tools.
- WDAC/AppLocker: explicitly allow only known-good .msc; deny execution from localized resource folders and user-writable paths.
5) People & process
- Run an awareness micro-module: “Never accept unsolicited remote-access on Teams. Verify via ticket + callback.”
- Table-top a scenario: help-desk impersonation → PowerShell dropper → MMC exploit → C2.
Indicators & context
- Domains/paths seen: cjhsbam[.]com, rivatalk[.]net, safesurf.fastdomain-uoemathhvq.workers.dev; twin .msc technique; AES-tasking over C2; SilentCrystal loader; SOCKS5 backdoor.
- Attribution & scope: EncryptHub (aka LARVA-208 / Water Gamayun) active since 2024; >600 orgs claimed impacted in reporting.
The bigger picture
Abuse of “work-trusted” channels (Teams, Slack, Quick Assist) is now routine in ransomware and stealer operations. Recent cases show Teams vishing setting up RAT installs and “support” sessions that end in domain compromise. The platform isn’t the problem; trust without verification is.
Bottom line
This campaign fuses social engineering with a Windows path-precedence quirk. If you patch CVE-2025-26633, lock down Teams external contact, verify support out-of-band, and hunt for Bypass-heavy PowerShell, you turn a high-probability breach into a blocked pop-up.
One-Page SOC Playbook (Teams “Request Remote Access” abuse)
Detect, contain, and prevent Teams-led social engineering that results in malicious .msc execution and data theft.
1) Patch & Exposure
- Deploy the March 2025 Windows updates addressing CVE-2025-26633 to all supported builds.
- Verify posture via WSUS/Intune/ConfigMgr compliance reports; track exceptions with a 48-hour SLA.
2) Microsoft Teams Guardrails
- External Access: Move to allow-list of trusted tenants; disable unsolicited chats from unknown domains.
- Support workflow: No remote control unless initiated from the corporate portal/ticket, plus callback verification from a published internal number.
- Education: 10-minute module: “Never accept unsolicited remote access.”
3) Detections to Enable (Microsoft Defender XDR – KQL)
A. PowerShell dropper patterns (bypass + web fetch):
DeviceProcessEvents
| where FileName =~ "powershell.exe"
| where ProcessCommandLine has_any ("-ExecutionPolicy Bypass","Invoke-RestMethod","Invoke-Expression","DownloadString","iwr","iex")
| project Timestamp=TimeGenerated, DeviceName, InitiatingProcessFileName, ProcessCommandLine, AccountName
| order by Timestamp desc
B. Teams as the launchpad (PowerShell child of Teams):
DeviceProcessEvents
| where FileName =~ "powershell.exe"
| where InitiatingProcessFileName has_any ("Teams.exe","ms-teams.exe")
| project TimeGenerated, DeviceName, InitiatingProcessFileName, ProcessCommandLine, AccountSid, AccountName
| order by TimeGenerated desc
C. MMC loading suspicious .msc (localized folders / path tricks):
DeviceImageLoadEvents
| where InitiatingProcessFileName =~ "mmc.exe"
| where FolderPath has @"\System32\en-US\" or FolderPath has @"\Windows \System32" // note possible trailing space
| project TimeGenerated, DeviceName, FolderPath, InitiatingProcessCommandLine
| order by TimeGenerated desc
D. Unexpected .msc file writes (resource folders):
DeviceFileEvents
| where FileName endswith ".msc"
| where FolderPath has @"\System32\en-US\"
| where InitiatingProcessFileName in~ ("powershell.exe","wscript.exe","cscript.exe")
| project TimeGenerated, DeviceName, FolderPath, InitiatingProcessFileName, InitiatingProcessCommandLine
| order by TimeGenerated desc
4) Containment & Hardening
- Isolate device in EDR if any rule above fires + user confirms unsolicited “IT” contact.
- Revoke tokens (AAD sign-ins, OAuth grants) and reset credentials from a known-clean host.
- ASR rules: Block abuse of LOLBins (Office child processes, script abuse); audit → enforce.
- WDAC/AppLocker: Allowlist known-good .msc; deny execution from localized resource folders and user-writable paths.
- PowerShell CLM where feasible; log Script Block/Module events to SIEM.
5) Comms & Aftercare
- Notify impacted users; provide a one-page “verify IT requests” reminder.
- Run retro hunt for the past 30–60 days with the KQL above; export findings for IR.
- Add the scenario to quarterly table-top: Teams impersonation → remote session → PowerShell → MMC hijack.
KPIs: Patch compliance ≥98% within 72h; zero unsolicited remote-access approvals; MDE detections triaged <1h; mean-time-to-isolation <15m.
Sources:
- CyberSecurityNews: Teams impersonation + remote access flow and runner.ps1 details. Cyber Security News
- Trustwave SpiderLabs: technical breakdown (EvilTwin, MUIPath precedence, SilentCrystal, IOCs). Trustwave
- Trend Micro: CVE-2025-26633 “MSC EvilTwin” analysis and Water Gamayun/EncryptHub link. Trend Micro
- NVD/MSRC: CVE-2025-26633 description and references. NVDMicrosoft Security Response Center
- CISA: KEV listing/alert for CVE-2025-26633. CISA
- Fortinet: Fickle Stealer capabilities/background. Fortinet
-
data breaches7 days ago
ALERT – Stop What You’re Doing & Update WinRAR Now
-
data breaches4 days ago
Hackers Claim Full Network Takeover at Royal Enfield
-
data breaches1 week ago
Leaked Logins Are the New Zero-Days—Here’s How Attackers Exploit Them
-
data breaches6 days ago
From VPN to FortiManager: Attack Pattern Suggests Preparation for New Exploit
-
data breaches4 days ago
Pennsylvania AG’s Website, Email Taken Down in Security Incident
-
International7 days ago
From Rabat to the Sahel: Moroccan Builders Lead Africa’s Largest Road Project
-
International1 week ago
Espionage in the Maghreb: Algerian-Spanish Deal to Counter Morocco Unearthed
-
data breaches4 days ago
New PS1Bot Malware Uses Fileless PowerShell for Data Theft