Blog
Pagers Detonate Across Lebanon in Coordinated Attack on Hezbollah Members
In a highly coordinated and unprecedented attack, a series of pager devices exploded across Lebanon, targeting members of the Hezbollah organization. This incident marks a new form of technological warfare in the region, raising concerns about the evolving nature of cyber and physical attacks in the Middle East.
The Incident: A Coordinated Strike
The attack occurred in multiple locations simultaneously, with reports indicating that dozens of pagers exploded within a short timeframe. The devices, which were commonly used by Hezbollah members for communication, were rigged with explosives. The blasts caused a mix of injuries and fatalities, although the exact number of casualties remains unclear due to the sensitive nature of the incident.
Hezbollah’s Response
Hezbollah has condemned the attack, labeling it an act of terrorism and a direct assault on its members. The organization has vowed to investigate the origins of the attack and bring those responsible to justice. In a statement released shortly after the incident, Hezbollah officials claimed that this was a sophisticated attack that demonstrated a high level of planning and technical expertise.
A New Kind of Threat
This attack signifies a troubling evolution in the methods used by adversaries in the region. Pagers, considered an outdated form of communication technology, were presumed to be a secure means of internal communication for Hezbollah members. The use of explosive devices in pagers indicates a deep level of infiltration and understanding of Hezbollah’s communication network.
Analysts suggest that this attack could mark the beginning of a new wave of asymmetric warfare in which traditional communication devices are weaponized. It also raises questions about the security of older technologies, which are often overlooked in cybersecurity discussions.
Potential Perpetrators
While no group has claimed responsibility for the attack, speculation is rife about the involvement of state actors or highly organized militant groups. The level of sophistication required to execute such a coordinated attack points to the possibility of support from external intelligence agencies or well-funded groups with advanced technical capabilities.
The Broader Implications
This attack has broader implications for security in Lebanon and the region. It underscores the need for groups like Hezbollah to reassess their communication security protocols and highlights the potential vulnerabilities in relying on outdated technology. It also serves as a stark reminder of the ever-evolving nature of warfare, where traditional and cyber tactics are increasingly intertwined.
The Role of Technology in Modern Conflict
The use of explosive-laden pagers is an example of how technology can be repurposed for malicious intent. In this case, an innocuous device turned into a deadly weapon. It also demonstrates the importance of cybersecurity and the need to continually update and secure communication channels to prevent such breaches.
Conclusion
The attack on Hezbollah members using explosive-laden pagers represents a new chapter in the complex and volatile security landscape of the Middle East. It raises critical questions about the safety of communication methods and the innovative ways in which technology can be weaponized. As Hezbollah investigates the attack and the region braces for potential retaliation, this incident serves as a reminder of the unpredictable and ever-changing nature of modern conflicts.
Blog
Morocco Sets Sights on 70% 5G Coverage by 2030 With New License Launch

RABAT — July 26, 2025
In a landmark step toward digital transformation, Morocco’s National Telecommunications Regulatory Agency (ANRT) has officially launched the bidding process for 5G licenses, inviting national and international telecom operators to help deliver 25% population coverage by 2026 and 70% by 2030.
5G Strategy to Power FIFA World Cup and Beyond
The initiative aligns with Morocco’s preparations to co-host the 2030 FIFA World Cup and its broader Maroc Digital 2030 agenda. “This is about more than faster networks—it’s about our national future,” said Driss El Yazami, policy advisor at the Ministry of Digital Transition.
Highlights of the 5G Deployment Plan
- Initial rollouts in Casablanca, Rabat, Marrakech, and Tangier
- Smart infrastructure integration in stadiums and airports
- Spectrum allocation in 3.5GHz and mmWave bands
- Coverage expansion to underserved rural regions
From Urban Startups to Rural Farmers: 5G’s National Reach
5G is expected to revolutionize Moroccan society. Students will gain access to virtual classrooms, remote clinics will offer telemedicine, and farmers can deploy smart sensors. “Connectivity is empowerment,” said Amina El Mahdi, a tech entrepreneur in Fez.
Economic Impact and Cybersecurity Measures
The Ministry of Finance predicts 5G will boost GDP by 1.5% by 2030. All operators must meet strict cybersecurity, data localization, and interoperability standards monitored by ANRT and the National Cybersecurity Directorate.
2030 World Cup: Smart Stadiums and Global Broadcasts
With over 1.5 million visitors expected, 5G will support crowd management, mobile ticketing, HD broadcasts, and fan engagement zones across Moroccan host cities.
5G infrastructure being deployed in Morocco’s major cities ahead of FIFA 2030.
Blog
Critical Cyber Breach in Tunisia: Government Systems and Banks Hacked, Confidential Data for Sale

A coordinated cyberattack led by Moroccan hacker Jokeir 07x and groups Dark Hell 07x and Dr. Shell 08x compromises key Tunisian institutions, exposing government systems, banking infrastructure, and personal data to global exploitation.
Tunis, July 2025 — In an alarming escalation of cyber threats across North Africa, Tunisia has become the latest victim of a highly organized and devastating cyberattack. Orchestrated by Moroccan threat actor Jokeir 07x, in partnership with the groups Dark Hell 07x and Dr. Shell 08x, the operation has compromised critical national infrastructure—from government domains to private financial institutions.
“This is not just a defacement campaign—it’s full infrastructure penetration,” declared Jokeir 07x on Telegram.
The targets include the Ministry of Finance, Bank of Tunisia, BTK, and the Tunisian Academy of Banking and Finance, among others. The attackers claim full access to internal systems, including emails, financial records, developer platforms, and sensitive citizen data.
🏛️ Government Domain Breached: Ministry of Finance
The domain finances.gov.tn
was infiltrated through 16 high-risk subdomains such as auth.
, gitlab.intra.
, mail.
, and login-tej.
According to hacker statements, these allowed access to:
- Internal recruitment systems
- Budgetary information
- Developer repositories
- Administrative emails
This level of penetration indicates control over Tunisia’s digital authentication infrastructure and DevOps environment, raising severe concerns for national cybersecurity.
🏦 Banking Sector Compromised and Data Sold
Several banks were also impacted:
- Bank of Tunisia (bt.com.tn):
- Full customer database allegedly available for $4,000
- Individual bank accounts offered at $100
- 5-account bundles sold for $450
- BTK Bank (btknet.com) and Academy of Banking and Finance (abf.tn) also suffered complete breaches, including control over the sites and underlying systems.
The incident signals not just a data breach but the active commercialization of sensitive financial information on the dark web.
🔍 Technical Breakdown: How It Happened
Cybersecurity analysts have pointed to multiple failure points within Tunisia’s digital infrastructure:
- Web Application Vulnerabilities:
- SQL Injection
- File Upload flaws
- XSS
- Remote File Inclusion (RFI)
- SSO and Mail System Exploitation:
- Session hijacking likely
- Weak session/cookie management
- GitLab Exposure:
- Unauthorized access to internal GitLab revealed API tokens, credentials, and system architecture
- Lack of Security Infrastructure:
- No evidence of WAF, IDS, or SIEM defense
- No active monitoring or response systems
- Inadequate Data Protection:
- Absence of encryption, data masking, or tokenization
- Entire banking datasets available in plain text
⚠️ The Fallout: Trust, Security, and Reputation
This attack lays bare the vulnerabilities in Tunisia’s cyber defenses, damaging public trust in both government institutions and the banking sector. The country’s financial and administrative data has now surfaced on international black markets, with potential long-term repercussions for national security and economic stability.
💡 Urgent Recommendations for Recovery and Reform
Cybersecurity professionals are urging Tunisia to immediately:
- Establish internal SOC (Security Operations Centers)
- Mandate routine penetration testing
- Enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA)
- Implement end-to-end data encryption
- Audit and secure GitLab instances
- Conduct staff training on social engineering threats
- Deploy real-time code and data monitoring
“Being hacked is not the shame—failing to learn from it is,” noted a Tunisian cybersecurity analyst. “The future belongs to those who invest in digital resilience, not legacy infrastructure.”
Blog
Cloud Wars 2025: Full Breakdown of Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud Services You Need to Know
As cloud computing reshapes digital infrastructure, this side-by-side comparison of services across Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services (AWS), and Google Cloud Platform (GCP) empowers IT professionals and organizations to make informed decisions.
Cloud Wars: Breaking Down the Giants
In today’s digital-first world, cloud computing isn’t just a trend—it’s the backbone of enterprise IT. Whether you’re a startup deploying an app or a global corporation migrating legacy systems, choosing the right cloud provider can make or break your operations. A newly circulated Cloud Services Comparison Cheatsheet provides an invaluable visual breakdown of offerings from Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services (AWS), and Google Cloud Platform (GCP), the three dominant players in the cloud arena.
Technical Deep Dive: Key Service Categories Compared
This infographic categorizes over 25 essential cloud services and maps each across Azure, AWS, and GCP equivalents. Here’s what stands out:
1. Compute Services
- Azure: Virtual Machines
- AWS: EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud)
- Google Cloud: Compute Engine
These services provide scalable virtual server environments, with options for predefined or custom machine types. Azure and AWS offer more mature ecosystems with hybrid cloud integrations, while GCP emphasizes fast boot times and sustained-use discounts.
2. Object Storage
- Azure Blob Storage
- Amazon S3
- Google Cloud Storage
All three services allow you to store large amounts of unstructured data. AWS S3 is known for its advanced features (like S3 Glacier), while Azure Blob integrates well with Microsoft services, and GCP offers multi-regional redundancy by default.
3. Serverless Computing
- Azure Functions
- AWS Lambda
- Google Cloud Functions
Serverless solutions allow developers to execute code without managing servers. AWS Lambda leads in ecosystem maturity, while Azure and Google offer solid integrations with their respective developer tools.
4. Content Delivery Networks (CDNs)
- Azure CDN, AWS CloudFront, and Google Cloud CDN
All three platforms offer global distribution of content to reduce latency. AWS CloudFront is widely adopted in large-scale enterprise environments, while Google leverages its backbone network to deliver high-speed content.
Security & Identity Management
Cloud security remains a priority as data breaches and compliance requirements escalate.
- Identity and Access Management (IAM) is offered across platforms with Azure Active Directory, AWS IAM, and Google Cloud IAM.
- Key Management Services (KMS) ensure secure handling of encryption keys across all three.
- Compliance tools like Azure Trust Center, AWS Cloud HSM, and Google Cloud Security help enterprises adhere to global regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, and ISO/IEC.
Specialized Services: AI, Containers, and Analytics
- Analytics: Azure Stream Analytics, Amazon Kinesis, and Google Dataflow enable real-time data processing.
- Containers: Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS), Amazon EKS, and Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) support modern container orchestration.
- Automation: Each provider supports automation—Azure with Azure Automation, AWS with OpsWorks, and GCP with Deployment Manager.
Notable Differences
Some categories reveal gaps:
- Google Cloud lacks direct equivalents for services like DNS management (Route 53, Azure DNS) or cloud notifications (AWS SNS, Azure Notification Hub).
- Azure leads in hybrid cloud features due to its integration with Windows Server and on-prem tools.
- AWS offers the broadest service portfolio, making it ideal for complex multi-cloud or global enterprise setups.
-
data breaches6 days ago
ALERT – Stop What You’re Doing & Update WinRAR Now
-
data breaches4 days ago
Hackers Claim Full Network Takeover at Royal Enfield
-
data breaches1 week ago
Leaked Logins Are the New Zero-Days—Here’s How Attackers Exploit Them
-
data breaches5 days ago
From VPN to FortiManager: Attack Pattern Suggests Preparation for New Exploit
-
data breaches3 days ago
Pennsylvania AG’s Website, Email Taken Down in Security Incident
-
International6 days ago
From Rabat to the Sahel: Moroccan Builders Lead Africa’s Largest Road Project
-
International1 week ago
Espionage in the Maghreb: Algerian-Spanish Deal to Counter Morocco Unearthed
-
business1 week ago
Bitcoin’s $121K Breakout Signals a New Era of Institutional Adoption